[nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)

[Paul Stewart]

We found that we were unable to police vlan's in both directions (perhaps we
missed something configuration wise but only inbound would work).. We our
only solution was then to break the vlan out into a pair of physical ports
and police input on each port therefore policing in both directions...
Unfortunately that meant 2 ports for every vlan and we didn't like that
idea..;)

I still have the spare sup (which is pulled right now) setup for native in
case someone can help us resolve that problem..;)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared at puck.nether.net] 
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:59 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: 'Tim Stevenson'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)


	Just wondering,

	Is there a reason why you're not just running Native?

	this is the path that the 6k sw is going.  If it's a new
6509, it's a good time to play with something different, IMHO.

	- Jared
	
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 08:49:24PM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi Tim.. No (see other post).. I found another problem kind of 
> related..
> 
> I had setup sc0 with a management Ip but it defaults to vlan1 (my 
> default vlan is 2 which is sc1 if I have this correct).. Move sc1 to 
> vlan 3 and changed sc0 to vlan 2... No difference yet however I 
> believe that your suggestion (and the other gentleman's) is on the 
> right track...
> 
> Thanks everyone..:)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Stevenson
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:39 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)
> 
> 
> Are any of the vlan 2 ports actually connected? The vlan interface 
> won't come up unless there is at least 1 port in the vlan that is up & 
> connected (autostate).
> 
> Tim
> 
> At 05:22 PM 3/18/2004, cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net quipped:
> >Message: 3
> >Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:19:39 -0500
> >From: "Paul Stewart" <pauls at nexicom.net>
> >Subject: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)
> >To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> >Message-ID: <000c01c40d50$400d3a50$640aa8c0 at pstewart>
> >Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="us-ascii"
> >
> >Hi everyone...
> >
> >I'm trying to bring a new 6509 online in hybrid mode... This is my
> >first attempt at hybrid mode (although I am used to 5500's with RSM 
> >cards so hoping it's not much different)....
> >
> >Anyways, my problem is getting native vlan online.
> 
> 
> Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
> Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
> Technical Marketing Engineer, Catalyst 6500
> Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com
> IP Phone: 408-526-6759
> ********************************************************
> The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
> and are intended for the specified recipients only.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.