[nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)

[Paul Stewart]

Actually.. It looks like it is up on the switch itself...

sc0: flags=63<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING>
        vlan 2 inet xxx.xxx.100.14 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
xxx.xxx.100.255

But on the msfc I get:

nrtc-6509#sh interfaces vlan 2
Vlan2 is down, line protocol is down

So it looks like it's a communication problem between the msfc and sup ?

I have seen a few sample configs now and they include a section like this:

router eigrp 100
 network 10.0.0.0

(example only)... Is this needed or is this a feature for something other
than basic vlan's etc?  

Thanks again,

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:25 PM
To: 'Tim Stevenson'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)


And that is not happening... Did you see anything wrong with the config?  I
realize it's asking yourself and others for quite a bit of "reading" but
we're kinda stuck at this point and don't know where to turn for assistance
other than this list...:)

Thanks again,

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Stevenson
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:17 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)


If sc0 is active in a given VLAN, autostate should bring the vlan interface
up, even w/no other ports are connected in that vlan. 

Tim

At 05:43 PM 3/18/2004, cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net quipped:
>Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:37:41 -0500
>From: "Paul Stewart" <pauls at nexicom.net>
>Subject: RE: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)
>To: "'John Wong'" <JohnWong at crimsonlogic.com>,
>     <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>Message-ID: <001001c40d52$c5280470$640aa8c0 at pstewart>
>Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="us-ascii"
>
>Actually not yet... Didn't realize that.. Thought that the interface
>would be up/down instead...
>
>We're going to bring this up live in the middle of the night (last try
>for this week) and see what happens... Be presuming something in my 
>config is wrong but if nobody sees anything wrong then maybe it's that 
>simple.... I'll have to laugh if that's it... Been suffering 
>brainfreeze now from look at this too long..;)
>
>Paul


Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Technical Marketing Engineer, Catalyst 6500
Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com
IP Phone: 408-526-6759
********************************************************
The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
and are intended for the specified recipients only.

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/