[nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)

[Tim Stevenson]

Well, that doesn't change the capabilities of the hardware - but indeed, some things are not implemented in native/hybrid (from the other side, eg, distributed forwarding).

Tim

At 06:44 PM 3/18/2004, Chris Griffin quipped:
>Unless of course you are running IPX.  IPX is switched in hardware under hybrid and in software on native... :-)
>
>Chris
>
>Tim Stevenson wrote:
>>Native or hybrid is not going the change the capabilities of the hardware - only sup720 is capable of egress policing, and even then, only on a Layer 3 routed interface (in native) or a VLAN basis. Sup2 supports only ingress policing.
>>Tim
>>At 06:23 PM 3/18/2004, Paul Stewart quipped:
>>
>>>We found that we were unable to police vlan's in both directions (perhaps we
>>>missed something configuration wise but only inbound would work).. We our
>>>only solution was then to break the vlan out into a pair of physical ports
>>>and police input on each port therefore policing in both directions...
>>>Unfortunately that meant 2 ports for every vlan and we didn't like that
>>>idea..;)
>>>
>>>I still have the spare sup (which is pulled right now) setup for native in
>>>case someone can help us resolve that problem..;)
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared at puck.nether.net] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:59 PM
>>>To: Paul Stewart
>>>Cc: 'Tim Stevenson'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>Subject: Re: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)
>>>
>>>
>>>   Just wondering,
>>>
>>>   Is there a reason why you're not just running Native?
>>>
>>>   this is the path that the 6k sw is going.  If it's a new
>>>6509, it's a good time to play with something different, IMHO.
>>>
>>>   - Jared
>>>   
>>>On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 08:49:24PM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Tim.. No (see other post).. I found another problem kind of related..
>>>>
>>>>I had setup sc0 with a management Ip but it defaults to vlan1 (my default vlan is 2 which is sc1 if I have this correct).. Move sc1 to vlan 3 and changed sc0 to vlan 2... No difference yet however I believe that your suggestion (and the other gentleman's) is on the right track...
>>>>
>>>>Thanks everyone..:)
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Stevenson
>>>>Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:39 PM
>>>>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>Subject: Re: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Are any of the vlan 2 ports actually connected? The vlan interface won't come up unless there is at least 1 port in the vlan that is up & connected (autostate).
>>>>
>>>>Tim
>>>>
>>>>At 05:22 PM 3/18/2004, cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net quipped:
>>>>
>>>>>Message: 3
>>>>>Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:19:39 -0500
>>>>>From: "Paul Stewart" <pauls at nexicom.net>
>>>>>Subject: [nsp] 6509 Help - Please! :)
>>>>>To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>>>>Message-ID: <000c01c40d50$400d3a50$640aa8c0 at pstewart>
>>>>>Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="us-ascii"
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi everyone...
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm trying to bring a new 6509 online in hybrid mode... This is my
>>>>>first attempt at hybrid mode (although I am used to 5500's with RSM cards so hoping it's not much different)....
>>>>>
>>>>>Anyways, my problem is getting native vlan online.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
>>>>Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
>>>>Technical Marketing Engineer, Catalyst 6500
>>>>Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com
>>>>IP Phone: 408-526-6759
>>>>********************************************************
>>>>The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
>>>>and are intended for the specified recipients only.
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>-- Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
>>>clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.
>>
>>Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
>>Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
>>Technical Marketing Engineer, Catalyst 6500
>>Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com
>>IP Phone: 408-526-6759
>>********************************************************
>>The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
>>and are intended for the specified recipients only.
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>-- 
>Chris Griffin                           cgriffin at ufl.edu
>Network Engineer - CCNP                 Phone: (352) 392-2061
>Computing and Networking Services       Fax:   (352) 392-9440
>University of Florida                   Gainesville, FL 32611


Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Technical Marketing Engineer, Catalyst 6500
Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com
IP Phone: 408-526-6759
********************************************************
The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
and are intended for the specified recipients only.