[nsp] Re: Catalyst 6500 Hybrid
Bryan
bryan at tec-works.com
Sat May 1 15:26:21 EDT 2004
Considering the 60meg/75-80PPS worth of 64byte UDP unicast packets and the
fact that an upgrade from non-VXR npe-225 to vxr npe-400 only gained about
8% better cpu usage the platform just doesn't seem to be able to handle it
with any processor.
I think dCEF is a must here along with more horsepower.
Bryan
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Simon Hamilton-Wilkes wrote:
> Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 12:15:35 -0700
> From: Simon Hamilton-Wilkes <simon at jettis.com>
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] Re: Catalyst 6500 Hybrid
>
> Have you looked at the NPE-G1? Might be a more cost effective way to
> increase CPU, and conserves some real estate too.
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list