[c-nsp] BGP on 6400 NRP, anyone doing it?

[Brian Feeny]

I posted a message last night, and accidently typed "6500" when what I 
meant was 6400's (NRP's),
so I am re-asking a question here and hoping some of you can give me 
some feedback.

Is anyone doing BGP on 6400 NRP's?  If so, is it working ok?

Specifically I have a set of NRP's that need to take 1 iBGP feed and 1 
eBGP feed,  and I have been told that
these do not play well with BGP, the sessions drop for unknown reasons, 
etc and are just unreliable when
it comes to thinking about running BGP on them.

I have BGP working on RSM's/NPE's/RSP's, etc with only 128MB in similar 
situations and although they
aren't speedy gonzales, it does work.  So I am skeptical about NRP's 
not being able to do this, and if anyone
has anything to say about it please let me know.

Brian

---------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP
Network Engineer
ShreveNet Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20041102/8c0e6b73/PGP.bin