[c-nsp] 2821 as a BGP Route Reflector
Majid Farid
MajidFarid at telecomottawa.com
Wed Nov 3 12:37:07 EST 2004
My 7304's are running 12.2.S4 but the new 7301's we got last week are
running 12.3.6(c)...
Majid Farid
ISP Specialist
Telecom Ottawa Limited.
majidfarid at telecomottawa.com
[P] 613.225.4631 ext 7220
[F] 613.225.0636
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:rodunn at cisco.com]
Sent: November 3, 2004 12:03 PM
To: Majid Farid
Cc: Rodney Dunn; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; Joshua Coombs
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2821 as a BGP Route Reflector
12.2(25)S images are on CCO for the 7301.
Not for the 7304 though. That is because there
were core CEF changes to support MPLS HA done
and the hardware implementations on the 7304 were
not yet ready when 12.2(25)S went out the door.
The 7304 will be shipping a bit later. The 7301
is a software based forwarding only architecture
so the changes there were less impacting.
That's why the 72xx and 75xx images are also there
for 12.2(25)S.
You should go with 25S1 if you upgrade currently.
Rodney
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Majid Farid wrote:
>
> Funny a lot of features are supported on 7301 as compared to 7304. I
> heard 12.5S5 is out for 7301 anyone confirm that?
>
> Majid Farid
> ISP Specialist
> Telecom Ottawa Limited.
> majidfarid at telecomottawa.com
> [P] 613.225.4631 ext 7220
> [F] 613.225.0636
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rodney Dunn
> Sent: November 3, 2004 11:32 AM
> To: Rodney Dunn
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; Joshua Coombs
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2821 as a BGP Route Reflector
>
> I need to make a correction here.
>
> 7301 is in 12.2S not 12.0S.
>
> Rodney
>
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 05:00:09PM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> > 7301 is a G1 based 1RU box that I see a lot
> > of customers use for this. And it can run
> > 12.0S/12.2S for all the BGP scalability
> > improvements.
> >
> > Rodney
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:38:07PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
> > > Looking to break away from iBGP meshing as our router count
climbs,
> > > I've been searching for a low cost Cisco box that supports a large
> > > chunk of ram, and found the 2821. Considering this unit(s) will
> > > just be doing BGP, protected from the world by routers on our
> > > network's edge, never actually routing packets, do they have
enough
> > > CPU to keep up with 3 uplinks providing full views (on other
> > > routers) and 10 routers peering with it?
> > >
> > > Or would I be better served looking at a 7200 and stuffing an
NPE-G1
> > > in it?
> > >
> > > Joshua Coombs
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list