[c-nsp] 7600 vs 12404

[McCallum, Robert]

For EoMPLS this can be done fine.  For ATM or Frame the label imposition is
still done on the OSMs

Robert McCallum 
CCIE #8757 R&S


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swmike at swm.pp.se] 
> Sent: 08 November 2004 11:39
> To: sthaug at nethelp.no
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 vs 12404
> 
> 
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> 
> > It's probably hair-splitting - but a 6500 can be operated 
> with a pure 
> > L3 configuration (IP addresses directly on all ports, no externally 
> > visible VLANs, no MAC address learning). In such a configuration, I 
> > would claim it's completely irrelevant to me whether part 
> of the box 
> > operates as an Ethernet switch internally, as long as it 
> does the job. 
> > I'd call it a router...
> 
> But can you put IP-adresses on subinterfaces (tagged) on 
> those ports, as 
> you would be able to do on a 7200/7300/12000, ie reuse the 
> same tag on 
> several ports as completely different? I thought this could 
> only be done 
> on the OSMs?
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco> -nsp
> archive at 
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>