[c-nsp] Performance Degradation Using VLANs
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Wed Nov 17 19:19:04 EST 2004
The performance hit would be very very little.
That's because the mac header rewrite is prebuilt
by CEF to include the vlan/dmac/smac information
and it's preprened just like if the vlan isn't
there.
You would have to test it to get exact numbers but
I've never seen anyone mention a difference in
the software forwarding path when adding subinterfaces
as a trunk that map to vlans.
Rodney
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 05:03:40PM -0500, Mario Antonio wrote:
> Brian,
>
> The router will be connected to a switch (Vlan Trunk)
> Customers will be connected via a radio which is connected to the switch
> (vlan trunk)
>
> Regards
>
> Mario Antonio
>
>
> ---
> [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System]
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list