[c-nsp] BGP --> EIGRP redistribution
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Mon Nov 22 18:09:13 EST 2004
I didn't see it in your configuration:
<snip>
>>> router eigrp xxxyy
>>> redistribute connected
>>> redistribute static
>>> redistribute bgp xxxyy route-map BGP-EIGRP-Redist
<snip>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:49:11PM -0500, Brant I. Stevens wrote:
> There is a default metric already...
>
>
> On 11/22/2004 05:39 PM, "Rodney Dunn" <rodunn at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't have time to test this in the lab right
> > now but just an idea too.
> >
> > Configure a default-metric under
> > the EIGRP process and see if the routes
> > go in then.
> >
> > I can't remember if the metric will be set
> > for EIGRP with the set metric command
> > in the route-map code.
> >
> > Rodney
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:27:40PM -0500, Brant I. Stevens wrote:
> >> I have the same problem at work...
> >>
> >> The funny thing is that the route in question is originated on another
> >> router via static-->bgp redistribution, and makes it into the router that is
> >> supposed to take it from BGP and put it into EIGRP. The prefix is in the
> >> routing table, but doesn't get into the EIGRP topology table. Are these the
> >> symptoms you are seeing?
> >>
> >> What platform are you using? One of my team members told be that clearing
> >> the route makes it redistribute properly.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/22/2004 04:03 PM, "Tim Devries" <tdevries at northrock.bm> wrote:
> >>
> >>> No, I did not have that command entered. BGP config in this instance is
> >>> extremely simple, sync disabled, and basically the only routes I have in the
> >>> table are the two routes I would like to redistribute.
> >>>
> >>> What confuses me about the command you suggest is that I also tried to
> >>> redistribute these two routes from BGP into EIGRP on my edge router, which
> >>> holds these routes in its BGP table as being of external origin. It didn't
> >>> work there either. From my understanding the command "bgp
> >>> redistribute-internal" is only for iBGP learned routes?
> >>>
> >>> In any case, thanks for the suggestion!
> >>>
> >>> Tim
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Earls, Michael [mailto:Michael.Earls at 53.com]
> >>> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 4:56 PM
> >>> To: 'Tim Devries'; 'cisco-nsp'
> >>> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BGP --> EIGRP redistribution
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can you add your BGP config? Do you have "bgp redistribute-internal" under
> >>> router bgp ASN.
> >>>
> >>> Michael
> >>>
> >>> Michael
> >>>
> >>> PGP Info: KeyID 0x0DFD993C
> >>> Fingerprint F903 0325 5105 2CDB 4BF4 C88B 72F7 BA7A 28CC 598A
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Tim Devries [mailto:tdevries at northrock.bm]
> >>> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 3:42 PM
> >>> To: 'cisco-nsp'
> >>> Subject: [c-nsp] BGP --> EIGRP redistribution
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've recently attempted redistribution of two networks learned from bgp into
> >>>
> >>> my igp (EIGRP) using a route map.
> >>>
> >>> Basic configuration looks like this:
> >>>
> >>> !
> >>> router eigrp xxxyy
> >>> redistribute connected
> >>> redistribute static
> >>> redistribute bgp xxxyy route-map BGP-EIGRP-Redist
> >>> !
> >>> !
> >>> route-map BGP-EIGRP-Redist permit 1
> >>> match ip address prefix-list GlobalNetworks
> >>> set metric 6500 1 255 1 1500
> >>> !
> >>>
> >>> ip prefix-list GlobalNetworks seq 1 permit 206.x.x.x/17
> >>> ip prefix-list GlobalNetworks seq 2 permit 152.x.x.x/16
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> When I do a 'show ip eigrp top 206.x.x.x/17', it returns "%
> >>> IP-EIGRP (AS xxxyy): Route not in topology table".
> >>>
> >>> On this router the bgp routes are learned via iBGP, however I have tried to
> >>> redistribute these two routes into EIGRP on other routers in my AS that
> >>> learn these routes directly from the peer (routes are tagged
> >>> external) and I've had no luck there either.
> >>>
> >>> Is there something I am missing? I feel like I have tried every
> >>> configuration from here to sundry, but nothing will redistribute from BGP
> >>> into EIGRP. The connected and static networks redistribute without issue.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>
> >>> Tim
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may
> >>> be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If
> >>> you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it
> >>> in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
> >>> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
> >>> prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender
> >>> that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your
> >>> computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list