[c-nsp] Failover with 3550-SMI

[Marco Matarazzo]

Of course it will... but costs for additional redundancy are to be paid by
customers... so if it's easier and  more manageable for me, it will be the
perfect solution! ;)

Cheers!
]\/[arco
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Turnbow" <b.turnbow at twt.it>
To: "Marco Matarazzo" <marmata at libero.it>; <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 1:37 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Failover with 3550-SMI


#3 will get pricey real fast ... 30 routers for customers(60 with hsrp)...
At that point it would cost less to use 3550s in layer 2 and  centralize
hsrp in 2 routers/switches.



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marco Matarazzo
Sent: venerdì 26 novembre 2004 12.50
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Failover with 3550-SMI

Ouch! You're very right, I read the document some time ago, but completely
forgot about it!
I see that you used 20 instances without problems... probably I'll never do
more than 30 on those, so I think it can ben done!
But I'll need to upgrade to EMI... :(
Did you ever tried something as in solution 3?

Thanks!