[c-nsp] OSPF NSSA Question

[Dan Armstrong]

I too thought I could set the interfaces passive, and do that:


router eigrp 100
 redistribute connected route-map public_subnets
 redistribute static route-map public_subnets
 passive-interface default
 network x.x.x.146 0.0.0.0
 neighbor x.x.x.150 Vlan903
 auto-summary
 eigrp stub connected static summary
 no eigrp log-neighbor-changes

I do the reverse on the other router.



They don't ever seem to form a relationship:

TCF-1.902.1ie2#sh ip eigrp nei
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 100
TCF-1.902.1ie2#




On Monday 04 October 2004 13:46, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:52:37AM -0400, Dan Armstrong wrote:
> > I could bump up the costs, but it would be nice if there was a clean way
> > to tell EIGRP to "F-Off don't neighbour with this guy"...
>
> IIRC the trick is to make the interface passive, and explicitely list
> the neighbour you *want* with "router eigrp 4321 / neighbour 1.2.3.4".
>
> (Another, if quite ugly, hack would be to control-plane ACL the EIGRP
> hello packets from the neighbouring 6509 to death...)
>
> gert