[c-nsp] OSPF NSSA Question

[lee.e.rian at census.gov]

I just tried it in the lab & it works if the interface is not passive - eg.

router eigrp 100
  passive-interface default
  no passive-interface vlan903
  neighbor x.x.x.150 vlan903


Can anybody at Cisco comment on what happened with bug CSCdv19648?  About a
year ago I got one of those "The following defect(s) in your Bug Watcher
profile were either added..." emails and now the bug is not publicly
visible

        BugID: CSCdv19648
        Title: Change the behavior of the eigrp neighbor command

--
Lee




|---------+--------------------------------->
|         |           Dan Armstrong         |
|         |           <dan at beanfield.com>   |
|         |           Sent by:              |
|         |           cisco-nsp-bounces at puck|
|         |           .nether.net           |
|         |                                 |
|         |                                 |
|         |           10/04/2004 02:05 PM   |
|         |           Please respond to dan |
|         |                                 |
|---------+--------------------------------->
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                                                             |
  |       To:       Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>                                                                                          |
  |       cc:       cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net                                                                                                   |
  |       Subject:  Re: [c-nsp] OSPF NSSA Question                                                                                              |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




I too thought I could set the interfaces passive, and do that:


router eigrp 100
 redistribute connected route-map public_subnets
 redistribute static route-map public_subnets
 passive-interface default
 network x.x.x.146 0.0.0.0
 neighbor x.x.x.150 Vlan903
 auto-summary
 eigrp stub connected static summary
 no eigrp log-neighbor-changes

I do the reverse on the other router.



They don't ever seem to form a relationship:

TCF-1.902.1ie2#sh ip eigrp nei
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 100
TCF-1.902.1ie2#




On Monday 04 October 2004 13:46, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:52:37AM -0400, Dan Armstrong wrote:
> > I could bump up the costs, but it would be nice if there was a clean
way
> > to tell EIGRP to "F-Off don't neighbour with this guy"...
>
> IIRC the trick is to make the interface passive, and explicitely list
> the neighbour you *want* with "router eigrp 4321 / neighbour 1.2.3.4".
>
> (Another, if quite ugly, hack would be to control-plane ACL the EIGRP
> hello packets from the neighbouring 6509 to death...)
>
> gert

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/