[c-nsp] GigE cards for 6509
temkin at sig.com
Thu Oct 14 16:08:47 EDT 2004
The cards don't support jumbo frames. As well, the ports are
oversubscribed. Further, the per-port queues are a lot smaller.
6148 is definitely a "client" 10/100/1000 blade.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 3:55 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] GigE cards for 6509
> We need some more GigE cards for our 6509. I contacted our
> supplier today and was told that a WS-X6316-GE-TX 16 port
> copper GigE card (which we already have one of and need
> another) is MORE money than a WS-X6148-GE-TX card which has
> 48 10/100/1000 ports on it.
> I'd be crazy not to buy a 6148 card it looks like... is there
> any catches that I should know of? This seems too easy..;)
> We use these cards to connect servers but also run some basic
> QOS functions and Dot1Q trunking on some interfaces...
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
More information about the cisco-nsp