[c-nsp] HSRP design question

Church, Chuck cchurch at netcogov.com
Tue Oct 19 08:49:58 EDT 2004


Unless there are other OSPF-speaking routers on the VLANs, it's a bunch
more overhead for two routers to have to maintain neighbor states for
dozens or hundreds of VLAN ints.  Keep them all passive except for two,
so if there's a need to reconfigure a VLAN or interface, you don't lose
routes.


Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch at netcogov.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vincent De
Keyzer
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 8:13 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] HSRP design question

Hello,
 
should two routers have an OSPF adjacency on each HSRP VLAN where they
standby to each other (on top of an "official" one on, say, a POS
back-to-back link)?
 
Or it does not matter?
 
Vincent
 
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list