[c-nsp] BGP question

[Stephen J. Wilcox]

its common sense and down to the individual to implement

/24 is usually the maximum altho many networks filter rir allocation boundaries 
also

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Benjie Ko wrote:

> Hi List,
> 
> Have heard of statements regarding the allowable
> prefixes for announcement for eBGP sessions is a /24
> or less and giving importance to aggregrate prefixes.
> Is there a RFC on this? Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> http://vote.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>