[c-nsp] EIGRP Adversing Problem

[Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN]

GUYZ,

depends on whether you want to keep adjacencies or not.

in EIGRP, 'passive-interface' statement kills adjacencies because 

__ALL__


hello traffic is __IGNORED__ in ### BOTH ### directions, so we 

__DONT__ 

want to use the 'passive-interface' statement.

i'd suggest a combo of filter (dist list) and inverting or negating
the passive interface command thusly to retain adjacencies.

access-list 25 deny any  ! THIS KILLS OUTBOUND ADVERTS - ADDED BONUS YOU CAN
				 ! LEAK UPDATES YOU WANT TO GET OUT AND JUST
AS QUICKLY
                         ! PLUG THE LEAK - PIRANHA at SUSPICIOUS.ORG

router eigrp 1
NO passive-interface 'INTERFACE#' 
distribute-list 25 out 'INTERFACE#'


~v/r
piranha


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Richard Danielli
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:33 AM
To: Mark
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP Adversing Problem


try

Interface-passive   on the interface of the connected network

-rd-


Mark wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I do not want a connected network to be advertised by EIGRP. How I can 
> make that?
> 
> Mark
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-- 
Richard Danielli
President - eSubnet

http://www.eSubnet.com
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/