[c-nsp] OSPF on PIX?

Rodney Dunn rodunn at cisco.com
Fri Sep 3 15:51:35 EDT 2004


I agree with you.  If the network is stable and
all you are doing is sending hellos you should
no see a consistent CPU that high.

Check the neighboring OSPF routers and do
sh ip ospf stat

and see if SPF is running a lot.

I don't know the commands for the PIX.

Rodney

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 01:58:40PM -0400, Adam Greene wrote:
> Yeah, we would much rather pass the traffic through the PIX than engage PIX
> in OSPF. I believe you can do this by configuring neighbor statements on the
> routers that need to communicate through the PIX. The neighbor statement
> causes updates to be sent unicast, thus overcoming the TTL issue.
> 
> Since updates don't happen that frequently between neighbors, I wouldn't
> expect that to account for all 15% of the additional CPU usage, but perhaps
> for some of it. It seems more like just listening for OSPF packets is what
> makes the PIX work so hard.
> 
> I'll check on reducing the priority to avoid DR/BDR negotiation. Thanks for
> the tip.
> 
> The reason we're considering enabling OSPF is that the PIX has 4 interfaces.
> We're generating redundant default routes from the two ASBRs on our network,
> each with a different metric, so we can have redundant paths to the
> Internet. The PIX receives default route metric 110 on Interface 1, and
> default route metric 10 on interface 2. We want hosts on Interface 3 of the
> PIX to be be able to make use of the primary gateway to the Internet (via
> interface 1) and if that fails, for them to use the secondary gateway (via
> interface 2). So far we haven't come up with a good way to do this aside
> from having the PIX participate in OSPF.
> 
> If the 15% load on the PIX will not affect performance, we can live with it.
> If it does, we may need to restructure things....
> 
> --A
> 
> ---
> [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list