[c-nsp] Network merging: factors to be considered
Amol Sapkal
amolsapkal at gmail.com
Mon Sep 6 11:34:42 EDT 2004
Hi,
First thing, this is not an actual scenario, its just a Question that
arised while my team was having a generic discussion.
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 01:21:27 -0500, Zaheer Aziz <zaziz at cisco.com> wrote:
> At 04:20 AM 9/4/2004 +0530, Amol Sapkal wrote:
> >Need to know what you guys think of this:
>
>
> There are several techniques depending on the circumstances.
>
> Few Q?
> 1)Will the new network be under one control?
Yes.
> 2)Any overlapping Private IP addresses?
Yes. But this can be resolved by re-designing the IP Scheming
> 3)Running two different IGPs (could you specify which ones) may pose some
> challenge
> with training, redistributions, loops etc.
OSFP and RIP
> 4)Can BGP can considered as an option to glue the two networks together?
>
Yes, IBGP could be considered. But we were considering redistribution
as an option.
> This should be a good start
>
> Zaheer
>
>
>
>
> >If I got 2 networks, that need to merged, both running different IGPs
> >what would be the design considerations?
> >
> >Considering redistribution as an option, what would be the obstacles and
> >checks?
> >What would be an alternative to redistribution?
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Warm Regds,
> >
> >Amol Sapkal
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind
> >- Mahatma Gandhi
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
--
Warm Regds,
Amol Sapkal
--------------------------------------------------------------------
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind
- Mahatma Gandhi
--------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list