UPDATE - Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 won't log link status changes? WTF?!

[David Sinn]

Because boot time and or day-to-day operational logging of a 6513 with 12 96
port 10/100 cards would suck.  :)

(OK, so this decision pre-dates the 96 port cards & the 6513, but the point
is still the same.  Someone at Cisco decided that logging lots of low speed
ports on a big box would be problematic.  So they left it up to the operator
to decide if it was or wasn't a problem for their network.)

David

On 9/14/04 1:56 PM, "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden at geek.net> wrote:

> So, the gist of it is that with 12.2.(18)SXD it appears, as long as you
> tell it to, you will indeed get link status log messages and that I jumped
> the gun in my rant after seeing the TAC case response and the release note
> caveat.
> 
> My apologies and my thanks to everyone that contacted me to either collect
> information or to politely call me a dumbass (because obviously I am on
> this one).
> 
> That said, perhaps to save a little face, why the heck isn't this on by
> default?