[c-nsp] Gigabit aggregation switches

Dave Breiland dave at opsource.net
Fri Sep 17 13:08:36 EDT 2004


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the only thing you really gain with
the 3550-12T is the possibility for Layer3 switching.  I haven't personally
tried it, but I believe you can route between VLANS on the 3550's.  

I recently implemented a 2970G-24 and have had no issues with it as of yet.
If I recall correctly, the 2970G-24 has a 24Gbps backplane, which seems most
important for your situation.  

The nice thing about the 2948G's that I have (48 port 10/100 w/ 2 GBICs) is
that it runs the CatOS... which I personally prefer.

Hopefully that gives you some info to think about and research.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Steve Francis
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 9:47 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Gigabit aggregation switches

Can anyone share experiences with WS-C3550-12T 
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/products_data_sheet09
186a00800913d0.html>, 
WS-C2970G-24TS-E 
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5206/products_data_sheet0
9186a0080197384.html> 
or WS-C2948G-GE-TX 
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps606/products_data_sheet09
186a00801cfafe.html>?

I've heard people say good things about 3550-12T, but is there anything 
wrong with the 2970, which gives me a lot more gig ports for about 50% 
the cost?

All I really want is a switch that does rapid spanning tree, ssh, and 
basic layer2 vlan stuff, while giving me more than the 2 gig ports you 
normally get on other 3550s.

Of course, the real issue is I want the switch to be stable.
Comments?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list