[c-nsp] Troubleshooting Lag between GigE interfaces
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Thu Sep 23 21:38:44 EDT 2004
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:31:57PM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> It's only for traffic to/from that slot.
OK, this was my understanding too. Thanks for confirmation.
> But if you want to do a lot of features (ie: QOS,
> MLPPP, etc.) then you must have dCEF or we don't support
> it.
Understood.
> My advice to customers is you do it one of two ways:
>
> a) Get an RSP fast enough to run in centralized CEF mode
> or
> b) Make sure all your cards are dCEF capable and have
> the CPU power to handle the features and run in dCEF mode.
Or:
c) Use a reasonable fast RSP (4 upwards) and use VIPs for all
higher-speed interfaces, and maybe reuse some old SSIP/FSIP
for slow-speed interfaces you don't need those dCEF-only
features on.
I see no reason for the OP to throw out the FSIP as you suggested,
because his problem was disabled dCEF on the VIP^WGEIP due to lack
of RAM on it. An SSIP/FSIP can't make an RSP4 sweat when using CEF.
> If I have an RSP that can do features at X rate which
> is more than the cards can do at Y rate I'm better off
> in centralized RSP mode. If the VIPs can do the work
> distributed much faster than I can do it centrally then
> I should go with dCEF mode.
>
> I see the most problems when customers try to run it
> in some hybrid mode.
As long as they know the constraints, this is no problem at all.
The problem is missing knowhow, not a technical problem. It's a
problem of not "using the right tool in the right way for the
job" -- I guess you'll agree here. :-)
BTW, thanks for your very valuable contributions to this mailing
list here, appreciated!
Best regards,
Daniel
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list