[c-nsp] 3750 switch stack

[Gyebnár Krisztián]

THX to all

we downgraded from 12.1(20) to 12.1(19) and everithing works very well...

Krisztián



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matt Bazan" <Mbazan at onelegal.com>
To: "Robert Hayden" <rhayden at doit.wisc.edu>; "Kris S. Amundson" 
<krisa at pdx.edu>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 3750 switch stack


12.1(19)EA1c has been rock solid for us.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Hayden
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:43 PM
> To: Kris S. Amundson
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3750 switch stack
>
>
> We/re actually running pretty recent code due to feature and bug fix
> issues.  Our whole network is 12.2.25SE although we expect to
> upgrade to
> 12.2.25SEC in fairly short order to address outstanding (but fairly
> minor) bugs we've encountered.
>
> Note that we almost exclusively use the 3750s as a edge and building
> aggregators only, with their customer VLANs trunked upstream to be
> routed on 6500s with Sup720s.
>
> Robert Hayden
> Network Guy
> University of Wisconsin
>
> Kris S. Amundson wrote:
> > Gyebnár Krisztián wrote:
> >
> >>thx Robert,
> >>
> >>Yes, earlier we did this:
> >>
> >>Switch#  Role      Mac Address     Priority     State
> >>--------------------------------------------------------
> >>*1       Master    0011.218c.f180     15        Ready
> >> 2       Slave     0012.0118.ba80     14        Ready
> >> 3       Slave     0012.0118.5b80     13        Ready
> >> 4       Slave     0012.0108.3300     12        Ready
> >> 5       Slave     0012.0118.1d80     11        Ready
> >> 6       Slave     0012.010a.8300     10        Ready
> >>
> >>if i reload the Master: no problem the switch 2 become the
> >>master(priority
> >>14)
> >
> >
> > What version of code are you running?  We've had an interesting
> > experience
> > implementing the 3750 platform.  The features and design of
> the platform is
> > excellent, and we have more than 100 deployed, but some of
> the features (DHCP
> > snooping & ARP inspection) rely on code that is buggy at best.
> >
> > Stable code we've been using has been 12.1(19)EA1d.  Buggy code has
> > been the
> > 12.2(20) - 12.2(25).
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/