[c-nsp] load balance over two unequal cost links?
christopher_a_kane at bankone.com
christopher_a_kane at bankone.com
Thu Apr 14 19:34:15 EDT 2005
That could be achieved with some metric manipulation depending upon the
protocol/s you are running. I think the objective would be more load
sharing than load balancing. But, before you go down that path, I'd be
concerned about the percentage of traffic that is TCP based. Depending on
distance and loads, could you incur out of sequence conditions that would
lead to so many re-transmissions as to render the solution more of a
hindrance than a help?
-chris
Christopher A Kane
"Matt Bazan" <Mbazan at onelegal.com>
Sent by: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
04/14/2005 06:23 PM
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
cc:
Subject: [c-nsp] load balance over two unequal cost links?
Got the following:
A----------B
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
C
Cisco 3640's. T1's between sites.
I'm looking for a way to load balance traffic from site A to site B
using the link between A <> B and A <> C <> B. Can I split traffic
based upon a particular port on the A router and load balance it using
both paths to B from A? Thanks.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list