[c-nsp] load balance over two unequal cost links?
Matt Bazan
Mbazan at onelegal.com
Thu Apr 14 20:19:37 EDT 2005
Thanks for the info. Yes, actually, it's all TCP and I would like to do
load sharing...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: christopher_a_kane at bankone.com
> [mailto:christopher_a_kane at bankone.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 4:34 PM
> To: Matt Bazan
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] load balance over two unequal cost links?
>
>
> That could be achieved with some metric manipulation
> depending upon the
> protocol/s you are running. I think the objective would be more load
> sharing than load balancing. But, before you go down that
> path, I'd be
> concerned about the percentage of traffic that is TCP based.
> Depending on
> distance and loads, could you incur out of sequence
> conditions that would
> lead to so many re-transmissions as to render the solution more of a
> hindrance than a help?
>
> -chris
>
>
>
>
> Christopher A Kane
>
> "Matt Bazan" <Mbazan at onelegal.com>
> Sent by: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> 04/14/2005 06:23 PM
>
> To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> cc:
> Subject: [c-nsp] load balance over two unequal
> cost links?
>
>
> Got the following:
>
> A----------B
> \ /
> \ /
> \ /
> \ /
> C
>
> Cisco 3640's. T1's between sites.
>
> I'm looking for a way to load balance traffic from site A to
> site B using the link between A <> B and A <> C <> B. Can I
> split traffic based upon a particular port on the A router
> and load balance it using both paths to B from A? Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
>
> This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use
> of the information contained herein (including any reliance
> thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this
> transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender
> and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in
> electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
>
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list