[c-nsp] Discussion with 6500/7600 Sup Modules
Volodymyr Yakovenko
vovik at dumpty.org
Thu Apr 21 12:53:21 EDT 2005
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Dan Lockwood wrote:
>I'm surfing through Software Advisor on CCO and do not see the Sup32
>listed as an option. Is it still too new? Since it has a built in
>MSFC2 can I assume that I has similar routing support, OSPF, etc to the
>720?
IOS (and routing) support is not yet released for SUP32.
>Thanks,
>Dan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Sinn
>Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 9:28 AM
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Discussion with 6500/7600 Sup Modules
>
>The Sup2 with DFC's will only support the quoted (marketing math) 256Gb
>if you have the fabric module installed.
>
>Effectively the Sup2 and Sup32 are equivalent baring three things:
>
>1) The Sup2 does support the addition of the Switch Fabric Module
>2) The Sup2 has a PFC2 while the Sup32 has the PFC3B/BXL.
>3) The Sup2 has the option of the MSFC2 while the Sup32 includes a
>MSFC2
>
>Since the Sup2 without a fabric operates in the same mode as a Sup32, so
>they both have the same throughput capability of (marketing math) 32Gb.
>The primary functional difference is the features on the PFC, so I would
>suggest looking into the PFC3B's feature set to see if that more aligns
>with what you want to accomplish.
>
>David
>
>On Apr 21, 2005, at 8:41 AM, Dan Lockwood wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are in the process of purchasing several new 6500/7600 devices for
>> a network overhaul and I have a few questions about the practical
>> application of the different supervisors. For core devices we want to
>
>> run the new SUP720, my confusion is for the access layer. We have a
>> large campus and data center that will be upgraded. The Sup1 is old
>> and I wont buy that. That leaves me with the Sup2, Sup32 and 720.
>> According to Cisco the New Sup32 only supports 32Gb while the Sup2 /w
>> DFC supports 256Gb. Is this correct or am I misunderstanding
>> something?
>> So the two questions I'm struggling with are 1) should I push L3
>> capabilities to the access switches and 2) What supervisor/series of
>> line cards (2A, 32, 720) should I consider?
>>
>> Any other important issues I have failed to consider?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Regards,
Volodymyr.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list