[c-nsp] Cat 6500 and counters
Roman Sokolov
rps at cheater.ru
Thu Apr 28 13:57:35 EDT 2005
Hello Dale,
Thursday, April 28, 2005, 7:27:54 PM, you wrote:
>>>> No, netflow does not have any impact on CPU at all
DWC> This is incorrect.
DWC> You will see an increase in switch processor (not route processor)
DWC> cpu utilization as a function of netflow entries.
In real life and busy system nde task can really eat whole supervisor cpu:
XX-sp#sh proc cpu | ex 0.00
CPU utilization for five seconds: 95%/48%; one minute: 92%; five minutes: 92%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
39 666159844 664735728 1002 6.15% 5.21% 5.30% 0 slcp process
64 42420396 222129733 190 0.15% 0.21% 0.23% 0 Compute load avg
89 130147160 8051198 16165 1.03% 1.04% 1.03% 0 Vlan Statistics
132 9550760 120346230 79 0.07% 0.06% 0.06% 0 CEF LC IPC Backg
221 2983762072 329456565 9056 36.37% 34.87% 35.23% 0 NDE - IPV4
222 22384302481593495662 1404 0.15% 0.12% 0.08% 0 NDE - MPLS
234 101523748 22667249 4478 2.15% 1.03% 0.95% 0 TAG Stats Backgr
241 132 133 992 0.55% 0.14% 0.03% 1 Virtual Exec
And it also can eat significant part of msfc cpu (it eats even more if you
use dfc's):
XX#sh proc cpu | ex 0.00
CPU utilization for five seconds: 68%/46%; one minute: 69%; five minutes: 70%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
87 2577938764 369578891 6975 17.83% 17.54% 17.74% 0 Earl NDE Task
111 3253422481424619988 228 2.95% 2.33% 2.29% 0 IP Input
139 5511524 4134385 1333 0.15% 0.03% 0.03% 0 IP RIB Update
141 7180188 22606555 317 0.15% 0.04% 0.03% 0 CEF process
269 22659416 64083834 353 0.39% 0.16% 0.13% 0 BGP Router
--
Best regards,
Roman
mailto:rps at cheater.ru
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list