[c-nsp] IPVPN and VRF Lite

[E.T.Metz at telecom.tno.nl]

Hi Sultan,

since the interfaces over which you want to establish the BGP sessions
are inside a VRF, you should also define the BGP peers in the context of
that VRF (and not at the global BGP level). In other words:

router bgp 65432
...
!
address-family ipv4 vrf vrf_red
redistribute connected
redistribute static
neighbor 172.24.0.1 remote-as 4058       <<<<
neighbor 172.24.0.1 activate             <<<<
neighbor 172.24.0.1 send-community both  <<<<
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
! 

etc.

Hope this helps.

cheers,
	Eduard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Sultan Shaikh
> Sent: dinsdag 23 augustus 2005 9:00
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] IPVPN and VRF Lite
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> This is the setup...
> 
> C1 - CE1 - PE1 - P - P - PE2 - CE2 - C2
> 
> C - Customer router
> CE - Customer Edge
> 
> I have VRF Lite configured on CE routers (Cisco 3745, IOS 12.2), I am 
> peering with PE on either side with eBGP on 3 separate 
> subinterfaces, will 
> be more clear from the configs of CE2 and PE2 (VRF and BGP 
> only) attached 
> herein, I am not able to populate my vrf table.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> sultan
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Enjoy Austria. http://www.coxandkings.com Only with Cox & Kings
>