[c-nsp] Negotiation problem with Catalyst 2950 and Cisco 2821
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Sat Dec 3 17:00:54 EST 2005
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:51:26PM -0700, John Neiberger wrote:
> We have the opposite philosophy. We set everything to auto. We have
> *far* more problems with hard-set switch settings. It's been my
> experience--and I have documentation at work to back this up--that
> hard setting your devices to 100/Full is the worst possible choice.
Yep. Before long, the customer will change *something* (like "upgrade
his NIC drivers", or "replace switch with different one") and his side
will revert to auto-neg.
Fairly inevitably, it will then go to half-duplex ("my peer doesn't do
autoneg? Must be a dumb hub, go to HD"), and the fun begins.
We've recently changed lots of 100/full-hardwired ports to auto/auto
(leading to a-100/a-full) due to lots of port errors reported by the
switch... and voila, all errors gone.
For some combinations, especially to Cisco *routers*, manually setting
100/full is required, as the PA-FE-TX (for example) just doesn't do
autoneg. But this is becoming the exception, not the rule, these days.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list