[c-nsp] Interface Bug?

John Neiberger jneiberger at gmail.com
Fri Dec 16 18:52:56 EST 2005


No reason. That interface doesn't really get used, anyway, so it's not
really a problem. I'm not sure how that command got there, though. It
must have been there for a while.

John

On 12/16/05, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:18:48PM -0700, John Neiberger wrote:
> >
> > interface Serial9/0
> >  ip address 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
> >  no ip route-cache cef
>
> Is there a special reason why CEF is off on this interface, and on on
> the serial9/2?
>
> Normally, with current releases, there should hardly ever be a reason
> to disable CEF.
>
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                            //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>


--
"Nothing will keep a person in everlasting ignorance so much as
contempt prior to investigation"



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list