[c-nsp] Network split in several VLANs

[Rey Martin]

since u r using rfc1918 IP address,
 I'll go for the 1st option, as long as you keep the default /16 subnet "not 
too crowded"

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Xavier" <xavier at rootshell.be>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:38 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] Network split in several VLANs


> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some advices...
> A /16 network with several hosts, servers, without a real IP assignment
> politic :( Used IP's: 10.50.0.0/16
>
> We need to split this subnet in several VLANs for security, performances, 
> etc... What the best way to achieve this? The VLANs will be managed by
> two Catalysts 4506.
>
> Keep 10.50.0.0/16 as a "default" VLAN and move hosts into new ones?
> (So we need to assign IP to servers, ...) and use new 10.60, 10.70, ...
>
> or
>
> Try to not change IP's and split the existing subnet?
>
> Xavier
> --
> It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/