[c-nsp] equivalent of juniper "routing-instance" on sup720

[Phil Rosenthal]

That's how you'd do it in the juniper world...

On Feb 8, 2005, at 5:26 PM, Phil Rosenthal wrote:

> Will this actually scale to having multiple full tables in the RIB?
> Can cisco reliably export routes from one bgp session into two VRF's?
>
> On Feb 7, 2005, at 9:10 PM, David Prall wrote:
>
>> VRF-Lite or Multi-VRF CE
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps259/ 
>> prod_bulletin09186a0080
>> 0921d7.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> David C Prall dcp at dcptech.com http://dcp.dcptech.com
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil  
>>> Rosenthal
>>> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:20 PM
>>> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> Subject: [c-nsp] equivalent of juniper "routing-instance" on sup720
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know if there's any way to get the equivalent of
>>> a juniper
>>> "routing-instance" on a sup720?  Eg, so I can have a routing
>>> table that
>>> will have all transit + peers, and another routing table that
>>> will only
>>> have "cheap" transit + peers, for two classes of customers?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --Phil
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> --Phil Rosenthal
> ISPrime, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--Phil Rosenthal
ISPrime, Inc.