[c-nsp] Vlans and catalyst 2950
Alban Dani
albcisco at gmail.com
Wed Feb 9 10:23:47 EST 2005
Hi there,
we are using VTP. All the new Vlans are created on the 6509 which is the core.
Here is the output of the show vlan on the cat2950:
cat2950#sh vlan id 41
VLAN Name Status Ports
---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------
41 Stevens active Fa0/6, Fa0/35, Fa0/46, Gi0/1
VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2
---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------
41 enet 100041 1500 - - - - - 0 0
Remote SPAN VLAN
----------------
Disabled
Primary Secondary Type Ports
cat2950#sh spanning-tree vlan 41
VLAN0041
Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
Root ID Priority 24617
Address 0009.b799.a680
Cost 28
Port 49 (GigabitEthernet0/1)
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 32809 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 41)
Address 000b.fd53.9540
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Aging Time 300
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
---------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
Fa0/35 Desg FWD 19 128.35 P2p
Fa0/46 Desg FWD 19 128.46 P2p
Gi0/1 Root FWD 4 128.49 P2p
Port Fa0/35 is trunked and Vlan 41 never makes it up this trunk unless
as I have explained I put a port on cat2950 on that vlan and get some
traffic in it.
Thanks,
Alban
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:58:15 +0200, Adrian Pirciu
<adrian.pirciu at rdsnet.ro> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Alban Dani wrote:
> > Hello Matthew,
> >
> > I also am having a very wierd issue with vlans and 2950-s.
> >
> > We are running pst+.
> > We have a 6509 in the core and everytime we try to get a new vlan
> > passed through a chain of switches( all connected via dot1q trunks)
> > that has a 2950 in it, it does not work. The only workaround we found
> > so far is to go to a port on the given 2950 , set the port on the
> > requried vlan and connect a machine to it and through some traffic.
> > That makes the 2950 aware of that vlan.
>
> a 2950 will not pass traffic for the vlans not defined in its table.
> When you put a port in a vlan, it automatically adds this vlan to the
> config (sh vlan) and it starts forwarding traffic for that vlan which
> explains the behaviour you describe.
>
> You can use VTP if you want to have a consistent vlan database accross
> you network. Be careful though (there are some bat things that can
> happen, read the documentation from www.cisco.com and they are
> described).
>
>
> >
> > If this was not enough, if the vlan in question does not see traffic
> > for a couple of days the 2950 totally forgets about it.
>
> I am not aware of anything resembling this behaviour. Anybody ? Does
> the vlan apper on "sh vlan" when this happens ?
>
> >
> > I am wondering if you ever found a solution to your problem and if so
> > what was it?
> >
> > I have upgraded to the latest IOS but it did not help.
>
> i'm pretty sure it is not an IOS/switch related problem.
>
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Alban
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> --
> adixor
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list