[c-nsp] Vlans and catalyst 2950
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
oboehmer at cisco.com
Wed Feb 9 10:33:59 EST 2005
Alban,
Did you enable vtp pruning? Can you send a "show trunk x/y" (CatOS) or
"show int xxx trunk" (IOS) on your Cat6k/core switch? It could be that
the 6k incorrectly pruned Vlan41 from the trunk. Workaround: disable vtp
pruning..
oli
Alban Dani <> wrote on Wednesday, February 09, 2005 4:24 PM:
> Hi there,
>
> we are using VTP. All the new Vlans are created on the 6509 which is
> the core.
>
> Here is the output of the show vlan on the cat2950:
>
> cat2950#sh vlan id 41
> VLAN Name Status Ports
> ---- -------------------------------- ---------
> ------------------------------- 41 Stevens
> active Fa0/6, Fa0/35, Fa0/46, Gi0/1 VLAN Type SAID MTU
> Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 ---- -----
> ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------
> 41 enet 100041 1500 - - - - - 0
> 0 Remote SPAN VLAN ----------------
> Disabled
> Primary Secondary Type Ports
>
> cat2950#sh spanning-tree vlan 41
>
> VLAN0041
> Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
> Root ID Priority 24617
> Address 0009.b799.a680
> Cost 28
> Port 49 (GigabitEthernet0/1)
> Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
>
> Bridge ID Priority 32809 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 41)
> Address 000b.fd53.9540
> Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
> Aging Time 300
>
> Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
> ---------------- ---- --- --------- --------
> -------------------------------- Fa0/35 Desg FWD 19
> 128.35 P2p
> Fa0/46 Desg FWD 19 128.46 P2p
> Gi0/1 Root FWD 4 128.49 P2p
>
> Port Fa0/35 is trunked and Vlan 41 never makes it up this trunk unless
> as I have explained I put a port on cat2950 on that vlan and get some
> traffic in it.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alban
>
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:58:15 +0200, Adrian Pirciu
> <adrian.pirciu at rdsnet.ro> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Alban Dani wrote:
>>> Hello Matthew,
>>>
>>> I also am having a very wierd issue with vlans and 2950-s.
>>>
>>> We are running pst+.
>>> We have a 6509 in the core and everytime we try to get a new vlan
>>> passed through a chain of switches( all connected via dot1q trunks)
>>> that has a 2950 in it, it does not work. The only workaround we
>>> found so far is to go to a port on the given 2950 , set the port on
>>> the requried vlan and connect a machine to it and through some
>>> traffic. That makes the 2950 aware of that vlan.
>>
>> a 2950 will not pass traffic for the vlans not defined in its table.
>> When you put a port in a vlan, it automatically adds this vlan to the
>> config (sh vlan) and it starts forwarding traffic for that vlan which
>> explains the behaviour you describe.
>>
>> You can use VTP if you want to have a consistent vlan database
>> accross you network. Be careful though (there are some bat things
>> that can happen, read the documentation from www.cisco.com and they
>> are described).
>>
>>
>>>
>>> If this was not enough, if the vlan in question does not see traffic
>>> for a couple of days the 2950 totally forgets about it.
>>
>> I am not aware of anything resembling this behaviour. Anybody ? Does
>> the vlan apper on "sh vlan" when this happens ?
>>
>>>
>>> I am wondering if you ever found a solution to your problem and if
>>> so what was it?
>>>
>>> I have upgraded to the latest IOS but it did not help.
>>
>> i'm pretty sure it is not an IOS/switch related problem.
>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Alban
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>> --
>> adixor
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list