[c-nsp] Different behaviour for static route on different IOS?

[chooweikeong at pacific.net.sg]

Hi Nick,

But how come the behaviour is different for the router running 12.0, which 
also has the 192.168.16.0/21 route?

Thanks,
Wei Keong

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Nick Shah wrote:

> That's because even though the 'specific' 192.168.16.48/30 is on
> Serial5/0 which is shutdown, there is a 'summary/aggregate' prefix
> 192.168.16.0/21 being learnt from GigabitEthernet0/1
>
> If you want to know for sure do a show ip route 192.168.16.48
> 255.255.255.252 and it will indeed tell you that its "not in routing
> table"
>
> rgds
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> chooweikeong at pacific.net.sg
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2005 2:04 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Different behaviour for static route on different IOS?
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Realise that there is a different behaviour for static route (next-hop
> to
> an interface ip) on IOS 12.3 and 12.0.
>
> As shown below, i've a static route next-hop to an interface ip, and the
>
> interface has been shutdown. For 12.0, the static route is not active,
> but
> for 12.3, the static route is active, even though the interface is down.
>
> Is this a 'new' feature? Since when is this feature introduced?
>
> Appreciate your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> Wei Keong
>
>
> IOS Ver 12.3(10)
> ----------------
>
> Serial5/0.1/1/3/1:8   192.168.16.49  YES manual administratively down
> down
>
> ip route 10.0.200.120 255.255.255.252 192.168.16.50
>
>
>> sh ip route 10.0.200.120
> Routing entry for 10.0.200.120/30
>   Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
>   Redistributing via ospf 10
>   Advertised by ospf 10 subnets
>   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>   * 192.168.16.50
>       Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>
>
>> sh ip route 192.168.16.50
> Routing entry for 192.168.16.0/21, supernet
>   Known via "ospf 10", distance 110, metric 20, type extern 2, forward
> metric 1
>   Last update from 10.9.1.6 on GigabitEthernet0/1, 6d22h ago
>   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>   * 10.9.1.6, from 192.168.3.6, 6d22h ago, via GigabitEthernet0/1
>       Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1
>
>
> IOS Ver 12.0(22)
> ----------------
> Serial6/3             192.168.16.49  YES manual administratively down
> down
>
> ip route 10.0.200.120 255.255.255.252 192.168.16.50
>
>> sh ip route 10.0.200.120
> % Subnet not in table
>
>> sh ip route 192.168.16.50
> Routing entry for 192.168.16.0/21, supernet
>   Known via "ospf 10", distance 110, metric 20, type extern 2, forward
> metric 1
>   Last update from 10.9.1.6 on GigabitEthernet0/3, 6d22h ago
>   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>   * 10.9.1.6, from 192.168.3.6, 6d22h ago, via GigabitEthernet0/3
>       Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please
> contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of
> this communication or disclose anything about it.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>