[c-nsp] Solution, Re: Latency on ATM IMA circuits
Peyton Koran
pkoran at uplogix.com
Wed Feb 23 14:35:23 EST 2005
Wow,
We have had the same problem. On a IMA link from Austin to Dallas we went
through Shreveport, and then they re-engineered it to move through Denver.
That was AT&T's solution to the original latency problem. Can someone say
"Build out your network, please?"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peyton Koran
Uplogix, Inc.
512-857-7026
pkoran at uplogix.com
> From: "John Neiberger" <John.Neiberger at efirstbank.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:59:59 -0700
> To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [c-nsp] Solution, Re: Latency on ATM IMA circuits
>
> I've discovered the cause of the latency on our IMA circuit. It turns
> out that Qwest had no available IMA cards in our area so they're routing
> our IMA connection through Sacramento.
>
> Did I mention that we're in Denver?? :)
>
> Thanks,
> John
> --
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list