[c-nsp] Inverse multiplexing DS3s to larger interfaces?

Peyton Koran pkoran at uplogix.com
Wed Feb 23 17:27:35 EST 2005


Wow,

Without using some muxing system (Like ATM or MPLS) you would probably have
to place another router there to accomplish what you want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peyton Koran
Uplogix, Inc.
512-857-7026
pkoran at uplogix.com


> From: "Thomas D.Simes" <simestd at netexpress.com>
> Organization: NetExpress
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:01:39 -0900
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Inverse multiplexing DS3s to larger interfaces?
> 
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:46:01 -0600
> Peyton Koran <pkoran at uplogix.com> wrote:
> 
>> It didn't sound like they were using POS.  Using a full DS3 (whether
>> it is channelized or not) you could use ATM to bond several DS3s via a
>> Knetrox an introduce them to a OC-12 interface on different PVCs.
>> 
>> Tom, are you using POS?  Is that what you meant by Packet over DS3?
> 
> Packet over serial DS3, as opposed to Packet Over SONET.  Would rather
> avoid the ATM overhead and complexity, BTDT with cell based MPLS over a
> Stratacom core (long story) and won't be doing it again any time soon
> for commodity Internet transport...
> 
> -- 
> Tom
> 
> ======================================================================
>  "Z-80 system stack overflow.  Shut 'er down Scotty, the system's
>        sucking mud" - Error message on TRS 80 Model-16B
> 
> Thomas D. Simes                                 simestd at netexpress.com
> ======================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list