[c-nsp] Inverse multiplexing DS3s to larger interfaces?
Peyton Koran
pkoran at uplogix.com
Wed Feb 23 17:27:35 EST 2005
Wow,
Without using some muxing system (Like ATM or MPLS) you would probably have
to place another router there to accomplish what you want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peyton Koran
Uplogix, Inc.
512-857-7026
pkoran at uplogix.com
> From: "Thomas D.Simes" <simestd at netexpress.com>
> Organization: NetExpress
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:01:39 -0900
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Inverse multiplexing DS3s to larger interfaces?
>
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:46:01 -0600
> Peyton Koran <pkoran at uplogix.com> wrote:
>
>> It didn't sound like they were using POS. Using a full DS3 (whether
>> it is channelized or not) you could use ATM to bond several DS3s via a
>> Knetrox an introduce them to a OC-12 interface on different PVCs.
>>
>> Tom, are you using POS? Is that what you meant by Packet over DS3?
>
> Packet over serial DS3, as opposed to Packet Over SONET. Would rather
> avoid the ATM overhead and complexity, BTDT with cell based MPLS over a
> Stratacom core (long story) and won't be doing it again any time soon
> for commodity Internet transport...
>
> --
> Tom
>
> ======================================================================
> "Z-80 system stack overflow. Shut 'er down Scotty, the system's
> sucking mud" - Error message on TRS 80 Model-16B
>
> Thomas D. Simes simestd at netexpress.com
> ======================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list