[c-nsp] VLSM

[Brant I. Stevens]

While I agree that having no class (when talking about networking :B) is a
good thing, "classfulness" is not completely dead...  Sometimes you still
have to use RIP v1..  There's also EIGRP and BGP auto-summary using classful
boundaries.


On 01/10/2005 06:59 PM, "lists at hojmark.org" <lists at hojmark.org> wrote:

>> However, I can't get people (sales) to stop calling it "class c".
> 
> Even worse is when they (and some 'techs') call everything /24 a "class C"
> and a every /16 a "class B", even when it's 10.10.10/24 and 10.10/16, for
> example.
> 
> Yuck.
> 
> -A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/