[c-nsp] Re: Cisco 7304 as a Border router
McCallum, Robert
robert.mccallum at thus.net
Tue Jan 18 04:58:44 EST 2005
PA-GE limitations are in ANY device that you plug it into i.e. max 400meg
throughput (and I mean best case throughput here). The PA-GE was developed
to work in a device which couldn't shift that amount of data anyway
(npe-400).
HtH
Robert McCallum
CCIE #8757 R&S
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graham [mailto:mahargk at gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 January 2005 02:37
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Re: Cisco 7304 as a Border router
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:30:24 -0500, Robert Blayzor
> <rblayzor at inoc.net> wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for anyones comments or experiences with using
> 7300's in a
> > border router deployment and if it's meeting your needs.
> I'm curious
> > as to what type and how much traffic you are pushing through it.
>
> Does anyone have experiences to share w/ PA-GE on the
> NPE-G1/7301/NPE-G100? Mainly wondering how much of the
> PA-GE's limitations were just shortcomings of NPE's at the time.
>
> Looking at the architecture, it would seem that the onboard
> GE's are 'better' given their integration, but is there any
> functional/performance difference?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list