[c-nsp] Re: Cisco 7304 as a Border router

McCallum, Robert robert.mccallum at thus.net
Tue Jan 18 04:58:44 EST 2005


PA-GE limitations are in ANY device that you plug it into i.e. max 400meg
throughput (and I mean best case throughput here).  The PA-GE was developed
to work in a device which couldn't shift that amount of data anyway
(npe-400).

HtH

Robert McCallum 
CCIE #8757 R&S


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graham [mailto:mahargk at gmail.com] 
> Sent: 18 January 2005 02:37
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Re: Cisco 7304 as a Border router
> 
> 
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:30:24 -0500, Robert Blayzor 
> <rblayzor at inoc.net> wrote:
> 
> > I'm looking for anyones comments or experiences with using 
> 7300's in a 
> > border router deployment and if it's meeting your needs.  
> I'm curious 
> > as to what type and how much traffic you are pushing through it.
> 
> Does anyone have experiences to share w/ PA-GE on the 
> NPE-G1/7301/NPE-G100? Mainly wondering how much of the 
> PA-GE's limitations were just shortcomings of NPE's at the time.
> 
> Looking at the architecture, it would seem that the onboard 
> GE's are 'better' given their integration, but is there any 
> functional/performance difference? 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list