[c-nsp] 6500/7600 with Sup720 opinion
CEW CEW
cewsg at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 26 09:06:28 EST 2005
We use sup720 PFC-3bxl, i think one of the limitation
we are facing is that does not support shaping unless
with OSM module installed. The OSM module is quite
pricy though.
--- "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi at 4ever.de> wrote:
> David,
>
> bambi at Hughes.com.au (David J. Hughes) wrote:
>
> > >I thought the platform was ideal for this, so
> what's the problem with
> > >76/65 IOS versions?
> >
> > Basic IPv4 functionality (i.e. BGP, OSPF, netflow,
> acl) is rock solid
> > on this platform. There are some horrible IOS
> bugs but the only ones
> > that have caused us issues is when we've tried
> something more
> > "adventurous". Haven't used 65xx in an MPLS
> environment or with v6, or
> > NSF, or SSO etc etc and I'm sure there's issues
> down those lines. But,
> > for basic routing/switching, it's a great
> platform.
>
> Alright, we'll be using them for v6 too, and I
> believe we should go
> forward with it, even if Cisco's software advisor
> doesn't know about
> SUP720 images, and even if there's no 12.3 or at
> least T train
> available...there's 12.2S, this should hopefully do
> (we don't need
> MPLS at the moment)
>
> Thank you for sharing,
> Elmar.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list