[c-nsp] 6500/7600 with Sup720 opinion

[CEW CEW]

We use sup720 PFC-3bxl, i think one of the limitation
we are facing is that does not support shaping unless
with OSM module installed. The OSM module is quite
pricy though.


--- "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi at 4ever.de> wrote:

> David,
> 
> bambi at Hughes.com.au (David J. Hughes) wrote:
> 
> > >I thought the platform was ideal for this, so
> what's the problem with
> > >76/65 IOS versions?
> > 
> > Basic IPv4 functionality (i.e. BGP, OSPF, netflow,
> acl) is rock solid 
> > on this platform.  There are some horrible IOS
> bugs but the only ones 
> > that have caused us issues is when we've tried
> something more 
> > "adventurous".  Haven't used 65xx in an MPLS
> environment or with v6, or 
> > NSF, or SSO etc etc and I'm sure there's issues
> down those lines.  But, 
> > for basic routing/switching, it's a great
> platform.
> 
> Alright, we'll be using them for v6 too, and I
> believe we should go
> forward with it, even if Cisco's software advisor
> doesn't know about
> SUP720 images, and even if there's no 12.3 or at
> least T train
> available...there's 12.2S, this should hopefully do
> (we don't need
> MPLS at the moment)
> 
> Thank you for sharing,
> 			Elmar.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 



	
		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail