[c-nsp] Reliable static routes and 12.2S
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Mon Jan 31 16:52:41 EST 2005
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:45:50PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:38:12PM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> > For a DSL type environment you usually are not running
> > a routing protocol over the links so what do you want
> > to react?
>
> Link status (or being able to tie static routes into BFD).
That's the one part I was thinking about was static routes.
Link status is almost surely a no go.
>
> Just something to reliably notice that part of the "usual" something-
> bridged-over-something-without-end-to-end-keepalives customer links
> isn't working anymore, *without* having to run a full-featured routing
> protocol with the CPE.
With statics I can see it.
ie: default on the CPE with dial backup upon primary failure.
Issue would probably become scalability.
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list