[c-nsp] Minimum Sun hardware requirement for running ACS

[Voll, Scott]

We just bought Cisco Secure ACS 3.3 (runs on windows) and we are currently
using Leap and Peap and it also does ttls, eap, etc.

We bought it mainly to take care of securing our wireless network.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Altman
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:42 AM
To: Jerry K
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Minimum Sun hardware requirement for running ACS

Good to know, we have a seperate LEAP infrastructure and you are
correct in that current ACS doesn't support LEAP (not sure if v4
will).

Perhaps someone from Cisco could comment on these two product lines
and their market direction as it appears they have some significant
overlap, yet are still maintaining unique feature sets too.  Maybe the
old Enterprise vs. Service Provider thing coming into play again?

On 7/12/05, Jerry K <cisco at oryx.cc> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Scott.  I don't think that Access Registrar has
> been down-ported to windows yet.  In 2001/2002 I worked on a large
> wireless project.  I used Solaris systems as the authentication servers
> as I needed something that would be very stable.
> 
> I also needed the availability of the LEAP protocol.  My cisco rep. told
> me that Cisco Secure ACS for Unix was on the way out and LEAP support
> would not be added to that product line.  I was told that Access
> Registrar was where I needed to be.
> 
> Again, as I stated originally, my information is a little dated, but I
> would be interested to know if any of this has changed to date.
> 
> Jerry K
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Scott Altman wrote:
> > That is incorrect, the ACS is still a supported and developed product.
> >  ACS 4.0 (due out later this year, I think) is/will be integral to
> > enterprise NAC implementations and other high-volume authentication
> > transaction services.  I can only really speak to the Wintel side of
> > things, from looking at the website it would appear that Unix support
> > may be lagging, but the overall product is still very much there.
> >
> >
> > On 7/12/05, Jerry K <cisco at oryx.cc> wrote:
> >
> >>My actual experience is a little dated, but it is/was my understanding
> >>that the Cisco Secure ACS was obsolete and was replaced by Cisco CNS
> >>Access Registrar, at least for stable platforms.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3291 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20050712/a3118177/smime.bin