[c-nsp] Bandwidth Shaping / QOS

[Church, Chuck]

Paul,

	I've used NBAR on many T1-connected sites with 1700 and 2600
routers and it's worked fine for P2P traffic.  Rarely see CPU over 10%,
although probably haven't been subjected to a DOS either.  I'm guessing
if the router you've got is 2650XM/3640 grade or higher, it'd work fine
with 10 meg traffic.


Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch at netcogov.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 10:31 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Bandwidth Shaping / QOS

We have an immediate need to shape some bandwidth based on applications
at a
remote site.  It's a wireless serving area and it's getting saturated
currently with peer to peer traffic or we presume so.
 
I've played with NBAR a lot in the past but we've never put it into
production for the purposes for limited Kazaa etc... 
 
Any thoughts on this?  One of our suppliers is pushing Allott
Netenforcer
gear and I'm interested in trying some of it out versus putting CPU load
on
the router at that location..?  Anyone used Allott gear and have
feedback?
Does Cisco make a standalone product good for this?
 
Thanks,
 
Paul
 
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/