[c-nsp] Bandwidth Shaping / QOS
Paul Stewart
pauls at nexicom.net
Thu Jul 14 16:55:02 EDT 2005
Wow... That's bizarre..;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Vowell [mailto:brian at zipsend.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 4:49 PM
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: Paul Stewart; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; Andre van der Merwe
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bandwidth Shaping / QOS
I've found the cheapest and most reliable is a Linksys WRT54g loaded
with firmware from http://www.dd-wrt.com/ does the trick better than
anything else. The QoS and traffic shaping settings are under
"Applications & Gaming".
--b
Church, Chuck wrote:
>Paul,
>
> I've used NBAR on many T1-connected sites with 1700 and 2600 routers
>and it's worked fine for P2P traffic. Rarely see CPU over 10%,
>although probably haven't been subjected to a DOS either. I'm guessing
>if the router you've got is 2650XM/3640 grade or higher, it'd work fine
>with 10 meg traffic.
>
>
>Chuck Church
>Lead Design Engineer
>CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
>Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
>1210 N. Parker Rd.
>Greenville, SC 29609
>Home office: 864-335-9473
>Cell: 703-819-3495
>cchurch at netcogov.com
>PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
>Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 10:31 AM
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: [c-nsp] Bandwidth Shaping / QOS
>
>We have an immediate need to shape some bandwidth based on applications
>at a remote site. It's a wireless serving area and it's getting
>saturated currently with peer to peer traffic or we presume so.
>
>I've played with NBAR a lot in the past but we've never put it into
>production for the purposes for limited Kazaa etc...
>
>Any thoughts on this? One of our suppliers is pushing Allott
>Netenforcer gear and I'm interested in trying some of it out versus
>putting CPU load on
>the router at that location..? Anyone used Allott gear and have
>feedback?
>Does Cisco make a standalone product good for this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Paul
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list