[c-nsp] Bandwidth Shaping / QOS

[Paul Stewart]

Thanks... I thought Sandvine was a different beast... meant more for 
optimizing peer2peer traffic by redirection to more localized sources 
etc.. I'll check it out again...

Paul


Tantsura, Jeff wrote:

>I think the Cisco's one is P-Cube, quite expensive though.
>Another one we use is Sandvine, much cheaper and does the job just fine.
>
>Jeff
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Stewart [mailto:pauls at nexicom.net]
>Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 4:31 PM
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: [c-nsp] Bandwidth Shaping / QOS
>
>
>We have an immediate need to shape some bandwidth based on applications at a
>remote site.  It's a wireless serving area and it's getting saturated
>currently with peer to peer traffic or we presume so.
> 
>I've played with NBAR a lot in the past but we've never put it into
>production for the purposes for limited Kazaa etc... 
> 
>Any thoughts on this?  One of our suppliers is pushing Allott Netenforcer
>gear and I'm interested in trying some of it out versus putting CPU load on
>the router at that location..?  Anyone used Allott gear and have feedback?
>Does Cisco make a standalone product good for this?
> 
>Thanks,
> 
>Paul
> 
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>  
>