[c-nsp] 6509 IOS Question
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Mon Jul 25 20:45:58 EDT 2005
check heaps runs every 60 seconds in the background.
You have enough traffic being switched by the MSFC at
interrupt level causing the CPU there (if 'sh align' is
clean).
Check 'sh int stat' and see if that gives you a starting
point on what interfaces to focus on. Clear the counters and
watch it for a couple minutes.
Rodney
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:58:20PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Here's the top results...
>
> CPU utilization for five seconds: 5%/5%; one minute: 16%; five minutes: 16%
> PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
> 104 26135340 240661081 108 0.23% 0.15% 0.17% 0 IP Input
> 132 100452 1779224 56 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Adj Manager
> 133 3489896 16214864 215 0.07% 0.03% 0.02% 0 CEF process
> 3 500 87 5747 0.00% 0.79% 0.20% 1 SSH Process
> 4 208672044 10576909 19729 0.00% 4.15% 3.44% 0 Check heaps
>
> It seems that "check heaps" is the biggest offender.... any thoughts?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Sinn [mailto:dsinn at dsinn.com]
> Sent: Mon 7/25/2005 5:30 PM
> To: Paul Stewart
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6509 IOS Question
>
> What's the output of a "show proc cpu" show? That will tell you if it
> is interrupt or process-level and if it is process-level which process
> it is.
>
> David
>
> On Jul 25, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
>
> > Hi there...
> >
> > We have a 6509 here that pushes about 80 Mb/s of traffic at peak..
> > Nothing major... But the CPU sits at 20% on average (on the MSFC
> > card)....
> >
> > Had some company here today from another ISP and they average 3-4% with
> > a few hundred Mb/s going through their 6509 (msfc2 as well)... They run
> > 12.1 and we're running 12.2SXD4 release... Could the IOS be a reason
> > for
> > much higher CPU? It's not causing us any grief but will down the road
> > with more traffic coming online shortly to that box...
> >
> > Our 6509 is taking 3 full BGP feeds inbound and providing one full feed
> > out... OSPF on routing etc... Nothing major really.. No firewalling...
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Paul Stewart
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list