[c-nsp] Power Redundancy in 3550 or 3750?
Andrew Fort
afort at choqolat.org
Fri Jul 29 03:16:55 EDT 2005
Jan Friedel wrote:
> Check the RPS675 solution.
<friday afternoon rant>
'Solution' is a strong word for the RPS675. :-)
Unfortunately, it's a bit of a joke. You waste an additional 1RU per
device you want redundant power for -- why? Because the RPS is designed
to protect against power supply unit failure, not power supply failure;
i.e., if you plug in more than one device to the RPS, and lose mains
power, only one of the devices attached to the (usually 5 or 6) power
sockets will receive power.
So, although it's the only solution to Skeeve's problem, it's a space
eater when you really just want another power supply that you attach to
UPS as opposed to raw power.
Also, when you switch from RPS back to mains, the switch will power
cycle; so power outages still require an outage, just that you get to
choose when it'll be. Rumor is that this is a design flaw.
</friday afternoon rant>
-andrew
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list