[c-nsp] Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?

[Patrick W. Gilmore]

On Jun 3, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Pete Templin wrote:

> Jerimiah Cole wrote:
>
>> What about tagging your prefixes as no-export instead of withdrawing
>> them entirely?  You'll still get traffic from Sprint and it's  
>> customers,
>> but that's significantly less than you would if they were announcing
>> your prefixes to their peers.  It may be a good compromise.
>
> It's not a good compromise.  There are (stupid, IMHO) networks who are
> single-homed to Sprint but run BGP and do NOT have a default route.
> No-export means no-reachy to those networks.
>
> BTDT.

Not sure I want connectivity to those people. :)

-- 
TTFN,
patrick