[c-nsp] Re: Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Pete Templin <petelists at templin.org> said:
> Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >>It's not a good compromise.  There are (stupid, IMHO) networks who are
> >>single-homed to Sprint but run BGP and do NOT have a default route.
> >>No-export means no-reachy to those networks.
> > 
> > Not sure I want connectivity to those people. :)
> 
> I agree, but then the PHB walks in the room...

We're not single-homed, but if "bad stuff" happens (Ciscos never crash,
right?), we can be for a period while we fix things.  If you don't want
to talk to our network because we've lost some of our connectivity,
that's your problem I guess.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.