[c-nsp] BGP enhancemens coming to 12.2S?

[Paul Stewart]

Thanks... Yeah I'd love to see the bug ID's because I'm getting ready to
bring another 6509 online with that IOS in the next week...

Appreciate it,

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Rosenthal [mailto:pr at isprime.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 9:56 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: 'Gert Doering'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP enhancemens coming to 12.2S?


Mainly we found bugs in:
CoPP (still not fixed, and will not be fixed)
route-maps (some fixed, some not fixed)
ibgp multipath (fixed)

The ones marked as fixed I haven't tested, but I am trusting the  
results of others who have tested.
I can give you bugID's tomorrow if you're interested.

--P
On Jun 7, 2005, at 6:29 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:

> Curious myself... What problems did you run into with 12.2(18)SXD4
> on 6500?
> We run 6500's with that IOS on MSFC2's and I'm not aware of any  
> problems....
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Rosenthal
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:53 PM
> To: Gert Doering
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP enhancemens coming to 12.2S?
>
>
> Out of curiosity, what problems did you run into with route-maps on 
> outbound?
>
> I've found them to not work on both inbound and outbound on 12.2(18) 
> SXD4 on 6500. (and I have a bugID that I'm told should be fixed for 
> 12.2(18)SXE2).
>
> On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> does anybody know (more precise: is permitted to speak about) a 
>> timeline when some of the really useful BGP enhancements from 12.0S 
>> will
>> appear
>> in 12.2S?
>>
>> Namely:
>>
>>   - removal of the BGP scanner CPU hog
>>
>>   - working "continue" statement in outbound route-maps
>>
>> The second one bit me painful today, and the first one is a
>> continuous
>> nuisance when trying to get an accurate picture on actual router CPU
>> usage.
>>
>> <rant>
>> As for "why are you using 12.2S"?  Because Cisco in their infinite 
>> wisdom decided that 12.0S isn't going to get IPv6 on 7200s and 7500s.  
>> And we're
>> offering commercial IPv6 services.
>>
>> Futhermore, as far as I understand the roadmap, 12.2S is supposed to 
>> be "better" for ISPs than 12.3/12.3T/12.4 (as in "more of the 'right'
>> features,
>> less bugs in the ISP-essential features").  But maybe that's wrong,
>> and
>> "S" really stands for "these people are used to the pain"...
>> </rant>
>>
>> gert
>> --
>> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>>                                                            // 
>> www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
>> gert at greenie.muc.de
>> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-
>> muenchen.de
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>