[c-nsp] BGP table growth and memory

Joe Maimon jmaimon at ttec.com
Tue Jun 21 12:21:26 EDT 2005



Michael Loftis wrote:
> 
> --On June 20, 2005 4:56:34 PM -0400 Joe Maimon <jmaimon at ttec.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Two full tables,Multipath, NPE-G1, 12.4(1a)
>>
>>Processor Pool Total:  921695156 Used:  289057040 Free:  632638116
>>
>>One full table,......
>>
>>Processor Pool Total:  921695156 Used:  236149360 Free:  685545796
> 
> 
> 
> Memory usage for any given AS Path (possibly other information) is 1x, 
> thereafter it's just referenced.  C, and J both do this.
And the 50M difference is?

> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list