[c-nsp] BGP table growth and memory
Joe Maimon
jmaimon at ttec.com
Tue Jun 21 12:21:26 EDT 2005
Michael Loftis wrote:
>
> --On June 20, 2005 4:56:34 PM -0400 Joe Maimon <jmaimon at ttec.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Two full tables,Multipath, NPE-G1, 12.4(1a)
>>
>>Processor Pool Total: 921695156 Used: 289057040 Free: 632638116
>>
>>One full table,......
>>
>>Processor Pool Total: 921695156 Used: 236149360 Free: 685545796
>
>
>
> Memory usage for any given AS Path (possibly other information) is 1x,
> thereafter it's just referenced. C, and J both do this.
And the 50M difference is?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list